The Fluctuating Work Week Method of Paying Overtime: The Employer's Friend (or Foe)

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), the general rule is that employers must pay overtime to non-exempt employees who work in excess of forty (40) hours per week, at the rate of one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate of pay. As a rule, most non-exempt employees are paid an hourly wage. The overtime calculation on that hourly wage is easy (i.e. time and one-half) and is also fixed by law as being time and one-half of that hourly rate.

It is perhaps a little known fact that the law does not command that employers pay non-exempt employees by the hour. It only mandates that such employees receive overtime, after forty hours of actual work. Employers may pay non-exempt employees by a salary, or per diem, or by piece rate. The overriding constant remains payment of overtime following forty hours of work. There are occasions when employers, for employee morale or “perception” reasons choose to pay non-exempt employees a salary. The FLSA (and most, but not all, state wage-hour laws) allows an employer and employee(s) to agree that they will be paid a fixed weekly wage to compensate them for all hours worked during the week. The calculation of overtime for such employees involves what is known as the “fluctuating work week” (“FWW”) method of overtime.

Employees who are compensated on a salaried basis and whose hours of work fluctuate from week to week may be paid a salary such that the fixed amount covers all straight time pay for whatever hours are worked in a given week. The following conditions must be met: 1) Hours must fluctuate from week to week; and, 2) There must be a clear and mutual understanding between the employee and employer that the fixed salary is compensation for the hours worked each work week, whatever the number; 3) The amount of salary must be sufficient to provide compensation to the employee at a rate not less than the applicable minimum wage rate for every hour worked; and, 4) The agreed-upon salary must be paid even though the workweek is one in which a full schedule of hours is not worked.

Neither the federal regulations nor the case law establish a requirement as to the degree of fluctuation in hours that must occur, but they do state that typically the salary is paid to employees who do not customarily work a regular schedule of hours. Under this method, the salary is intended to compensate the employee at a straight time rate for whatever hours are worked during the workweek. As such, the regular hourly rate of the employee will vary from week to week and is determined by dividing the total number of hours worked in the workweek into the amount of the salary. Overtime is then calculated by multiplying the hours in excess of forty by the regular rate for that week by one-half.

There may be only limited circumstances in which an employer will choose to utilize the FWW method of paying overtime. For one thing, the calculation of the “regular rate,” upon which all overtime is based will change every week. Therefore, the employer must either assign these computational tasks to an employee or buy/devise a software program to accommodate the necessary calculations. Second, there is the quid of paying employees their full salary in weeks in which they perform any work. Balanced against these is the distinct advantage of being able to pay half-time, instead of time and one-half, overtime. This becomes of great significance if the position at issue is borderline from the perspective of exempt status and the employer wishes to lower its exposure if a subsequent Department of Labor audit or lawsuit results in a finding that the position is non-exempt. Perhaps of equal importance, there is the positive employee relations gained through employee perception of their job as a “white collar,” as opposed to a blue collar, position.

Just be aware that if this payment procedure is not implemented correctly, the workers could be transformed into hourly employees and then there would be possible significant liability for the employer

Basic Principles For Employer Compliance


The general rule under federal law is that employers must pay overtime to employees who actually work over forty hours a week at a rate of one and one half times the employee's regular rate of pay. The FLSA expressly exempts three major categories of employee from overtime requirements: executive employees, administrative employees and professional employees. Whether an employee is exempt depends on: 1) his duties and responsibilities; and, 2) payment of a statutorily prescribed salary, which is now $455 per week under the FLSA.

Employees must be paid for all hours of work, which includes all times they are on duty. Under the FLSA, for a meal or break period not to be counted as on duty time, the meal period must be at least thirty (30) minutes, the employee must be completely relieved of all duties. Some states, such as New Jersey, add the further requirement that employees must have the ability to leave the premises, as well as being relieved of all duties.

Under both federal and state law, employers are required to maintain, among other things, records of hours worked by non-exempt employees, on a daily and weekly basis. The precise manner in which such records must be collected is not specified. Thus, the employer is free to utilize a time clock, sign-in sheet, or any system which will ensure that accurate records are maintained. In this regard, the records should also indicate the time taken for lunch. For example, an employee punching a time clock should punch in at the beginning of his shift, punch out for lunch, punch back in when he returns from lunch and then punch out at the end of his shift. In this manner, controversies concerning the length of the shift or “actual” working time will be eliminated. The employer must also maintain a record of the rate that the employee is being paid and that rate, as well as hours worked each day and week and any overtime hours, must be reflected on the pay stub given to the employee on each pay day, as well as in the employer’s records.

Most importantly, employees may not be directed to, for example, punch out, as if they were finished for the day, but nevertheless continue working, for labor “budget” or “cost” reasons. Neither should any manager direct an employee not to report legitimate overtime hours that have been worked either at the direction of a supervisor or with his permission, explicit or implicit. Note that the FLSA specifically provides that hours of work which are “suffered” or “permitted” are to be counted as compensable working time. It is certainly allowable, however, to mandate that no employees work overtime (or through lunch) without receiving supervisory approval, but once that approval is given, the hours must be properly and accurately recorded and paid at the overtime rate. Failure to do this will most likely result in findings of “willfulness” by an agency or a court, with a dramatic escalation of fines/penalties and wage assessments. Further, employees cannot legally waive their right to overtime or “agree” not to be paid overtime at the proper rate. In short, if the hours have been worked, the employee(s) must be properly paid.

Under the FLSA, the federal Department of Labor may conduct inspections or audits of employer payroll practices and may sue employers to recover back wages, including overtime, liquidated damages in an amount equal to the back wages and attorneys’ fees, as well as seeking injunctive relief If the Department of Labor uncovers even a single violation, it will likely conduct an audit as to all employees in a particular classification or even of the entire company. The limitations period runs two years prior to the date the DOL conducts its inspection or when a complaint is filed (counting backwards), except in the case of a willful violation when it is extended to three years. Thus, if a violation is uncovered in an initial governmental investigation and an employer goes into immediate compliance prior to the filing of a complaint by the Solicitor General, time will run to the employer's benefit up to the date of complaint, i.e., damages will be computed only for the prior two years, less the time period in which the employer was in compliance.

The above highlights the basic principles that every employer must implement in order to be in compliance with wage-hour laws and, more to the point, avoid unjust or exaggerated employee claims. Doing these things is for the employer’s protection, regardless of how tedious or time-consuming the actual steps are.  Remember, a group of employees can easily lodge a claim or class action, alleging that they all worked through lunch for two years and are entitled to compensation for that time.  If the time cards do not show that the employees punch out for lunch and then punch back in, the employer's ability to defend will be greatly hampered. 

The lesson---proactive measures are the best ones to take!